<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari comes in auto-update. Windows users under ADD, Cannot see update options!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moviesonitunes.com/2008/03/21/safari-comes-in-auto-update-windows-users-under-add-cannot-see-update-options/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moviesonitunes.com/2008/03/21/safari-comes-in-auto-update-windows-users-under-add-cannot-see-update-options/</link>
	<description>iPhone, iTunes, iPod and iObsession. Tracking Entertainment On iTunes Platform</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.moviesonitunes.com/2008/03/21/safari-comes-in-auto-update-windows-users-under-add-cannot-see-update-options/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviesonitunes.com/2008/03/21/safari-comes-in-auto-update-windows-users-under-add-cannot-see-update-options/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>His concern is hollow. Anybody who went through automated update and restart drill with Firefox should know better:- 

Thatâ€™s a problem because of the dynamic I described above â€” by and large, all software makers are trying to get users to trust us on updates, and so the likely behavior here is for users to just click â€œInstall 2 items,â€ which means that theyâ€™ve now installed a completely new piece of software, quite possibly completely unintentionally. Apple has made it incredibly easy â€” the default, even â€” for users to install ride along software that they didnâ€™t ask for, and maybe didnâ€™t want. This is wrong, and borders on malware distribution practices.

Itâ€™s wrong because it undermines the trust that weâ€™re all trying to build with users. Because it means that an update isnâ€™t just an update, but is maybe something more. Because it ultimately undermines the safety of users on the web by eroding that relationship. Itâ€™s a bad practice and should stop.

[Iâ€™ll make 2 points that I want to make very clear: (1) this is not a criticism of Safari as a web browser in any way, and (2) I have no objections to the basic industry practice of using your installed software as a channel for other software. This is specifically a criticism of the way theyâ€™re using the updating system. Iâ€™d much prefer to be writing about Firefox, but this practice hurts everyone and is important to note.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His concern is hollow. Anybody who went through automated update and restart drill with Firefox should know better:- </p>
<p>Thatâ€™s a problem because of the dynamic I described above â€” by and large, all software makers are trying to get users to trust us on updates, and so the likely behavior here is for users to just click â€œInstall 2 items,â€ which means that theyâ€™ve now installed a completely new piece of software, quite possibly completely unintentionally. Apple has made it incredibly easy â€” the default, even â€” for users to install ride along software that they didnâ€™t ask for, and maybe didnâ€™t want. This is wrong, and borders on malware distribution practices.</p>
<p>Itâ€™s wrong because it undermines the trust that weâ€™re all trying to build with users. Because it means that an update isnâ€™t just an update, but is maybe something more. Because it ultimately undermines the safety of users on the web by eroding that relationship. Itâ€™s a bad practice and should stop.</p>
<p>[Iâ€™ll make 2 points that I want to make very clear: (1) this is not a criticism of Safari as a web browser in any way, and (2) I have no objections to the basic industry practice of using your installed software as a channel for other software. This is specifically a criticism of the way theyâ€™re using the updating system. Iâ€™d much prefer to be writing about Firefox, but this practice hurts everyone and is important to note.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
